|
article
feature |
|
Back
|
Print
|
Bookmark |
|
Hurt? Injured? Need a Lawyer? Too Bad! |
| |
|
In 2002, rich and powerful Texans said lawsuits
were ruining the state’s economy and needed to be
fairer. Today, thanks to tort reform, they are
fairer - for business. Ordinary people are out of
luck. |
Extracted from larger story on Texans for
Lawsuit Reform (TLR),
with emphasis
added.
JUST BEFORE HE SIGNED the contract for his house, on New Year’s
Day 2002, Brian Zaltsberg looked the
KB Home salesman in the eye and gave him a
stern warning. “Go ahead and lose the commission if there
are going to be problems with the house,” he said.
“Because your time will be better spent on someone else. If
you screw me, I’m gonna come back on ya.”
The salesman for KB, one of the nation’s largest homebuilders,
promised that the house would be just fine. So Brian and his
fiancée, Stephanie, signed the contract and, thrilled, became
first-time homeowners. They were just two
young kids-27 and 23 years old, respectively-without much
education or money to throw around. Brian, tall, wiry, and
favoring gimme caps, was determined to finish college while he
earned a living developing Web sites and repairing computers.
Porcelain-skinned Stephanie had finished high school and was
looking forward to life as a homemaker and a mom. Brian felt
they had bought, for their hard-earned
$140,000, a piece of the American dream.
“Happy people,” Brian said of his envisioned future,
when the three of us met at his favorite Mexican restaurant in
Fort Worth. “Dream home and all that.” The
1,800-square-foot one-story brick house, in a
sun-scorched suburb on the northwest side of the city, was far
from lavish, but to the Zaltsbergs, it was paradise. “We
were so damn excited,” Stephanie told me.
But the trouble started even before they moved in.
Groundbreaking was delayed, and then construction was erratic.
Brian would often find the site littered with trash and once
pulled containers from fast-food restaurants from the
half-finished walls. But those were small problems compared
with the one that took place on moving day.
The Zaltsbergs stored many of their belongings in the garage
while they set up the house, and as night fell, so did a
downpour. Brian stepped outside for a smoke and noticed that
water was flowing from inside the garage out into the street.
He ran inside and saw water cascading down the walls and
pooling on the floor, soaking into everything they had stored
there. The Zaltsbergs had paid an extra $2,000 for a drywalled
garage; now the Sheetrock was damaged and everything within was
ruined.
Every day after that seemed to bring new problems: KB
repaired the roof flashing where the leak had occurred but
refused to replace the Sheetrock; the attic door stuck, and
some of the rafters in the attic had split. Brian could pry
bricks out of their mortar on exterior walls, and shingles
flipped up in the wind. He asked KB to schedule
repairs so that workmen wouldn’t interrupt meetings with
clients at his home, but they showed up unannounced.
Eventually, Brian demanded a meeting with KB. He was stressed
to the max; he wanted KB to buy the house back
from him. “I don’t want to live there anymore,” he
told them. KB refused. Then Brian threatened KB with the only
weapon he had: He would exercise his First Amendment rights and
put up a Web site he would call
kbhomesucks.com. The representative laughed in
his face and told him to go ahead.
Why, you may wonder, didn’t Brian sue KB?
Because his contract prohibited him from doing so. It required
him to seek binding arbitration instead of
redress in the civil courts. In fact, only a handful of lawyers
in Texas are now representing people who try to sue
homebuilders, because the cases are so hard to win and so
expensive to try before arbitration panels. “I always
thought it was your constitutional right to sue people,”
Brian said. “But we couldn’t sue KB.” Like victims of
medical malpractice, homeowners have seen their access to the
courthouse curtailed.
Had Brian’s confrontation with KB taken place a couple years
later, he would have run into another obstacle: During the tort
reform frenzy of 2003 that TLR helped stir up, the Legislature,
after intense lobbying and millions of dollars in contributions
from homebuilder Bob Perry, created the
Texas Residential Construction Commission
(TRCC). Disgruntled homeowners were not allowed to go
directly to court; first, they had to go to the TRCC, an agency
heavily influenced by homebuilders, for a determination of
whether their case had merit, a finding that would then be
admissible in court. (TLR did not endorse or lobby for this
bill.)
Brian didn’t want to go to arbitration. He couldn’t afford an
attorney. Instead, he decided to make good on his initial
threat: In January 2003 he launched kbhomesucks.com. Almost
immediately, he was swamped with e-mails from people claiming
to have been harmed by the company. They posted their
complaints too, and Brian added links for finding help. He
appeared in a few local news stories, and pretty soon he was
getting between 1,200 and 2,000 hits a day on his Web site.
Then one night he checked his e-mail and found one from a
lawyer, asking for the person in charge of the site. Attached
was a copy of a $20 million lawsuit filed against someone else
who had tried to take on KB. “I took that as a
threat,” Brian told me. Still, Brian contacted the lawyer
and requested a meeting with KB’s director of customer service.
Brian had stopped paying on the house by then; KB had agreed to
buy it back if he would disable his Web site. For a moment,
peace appeared to be at hand. But then Brian asked for $4,000
in moving expenses and for reimbursement of his down payment.
KB said it would not exchange any cash with him until the house
sold. That was a deal breaker for Brian, so, as he put it,
“the deal broke.”
Three months later, Brian started getting anonymous,
threatening e-mails, including ones that
suggested that his wife was being unfaithful, which added to
the stress at home. (Stephanie had a miscarriage that spring.)
Eventually, Brian started protesting publicly in front of KB’s
Fort Worth offices and was harassed by the
police. He had the persistent feeling he was being
watched.
Finally, in September 2004, Brian sued KB in state
court for harassment. The company
countersued in October, hitting him with what
many lawyers call a “slap suit,” a lawsuit filed by a
big company against a much smaller firm or individual to try to
scare the other party off. Among the claims against Brian was
an accusation of cyber squatting, for misusing the KB name.
Since that time, Brian has found himself in a lawsuit many
might call frivolous, especially since it involves a company
worth hundreds of millions and an accused party worth very
little.
In late August of this year, Brian finally got to arbitration;
to KB’s dismay, he was allowed to keep kbhomesucks.com up and
running. In a much bigger case settled around the same
time, KB Home was fined $2 million by the Federal Trade
Commission and, more important, was prohibited from requiring
mandatory arbitration in its homeowners’ contracts.
The ruling came too late for Brian and Stephanie, who by then
had let the bank take their house. “This is hell on earth,
that’s what it is,” Stephanie said.
by Mimi Swartz, Texas Monthly, 11/01/2005
Source: http://www.texasmonthly.com/2005-11-01/feature4-4.php
HOT: Brian's website is no
longer operational. Apparently KB Home forced him to
take it down afterall. Since then, however, several other
similar sites have appeared. While we can't endorse any of
these site, they include:
↑
Back to Top
|