Highlights and [bracketed comments] added

[HOT: We include this article because access to homeowner and home builder information is similarly effected, as discussed at the end of this article.]

The Texas legislative session is churning into its final three weeks and advocacy groups are battling against measures that could close state records to public eyes and private eyes.

Organizations representing news media and private investigators are armed with lists of scores of bills that each group says would unfairly and unnecessarily restrict disclosure of some governmental records.

Arlington private investigator Randy Kildow, president of the Texas Association of Licensed Investigators, said he's been playing defense throughout the session as his group monitors more than 100 bills relating to disclosure of government information. "Every one of them hurts," he said.

Advocates for open government say that public information is under increasing attack, particularly as records become more accessible via the Internet and people worry about privacy. Some open records advocates are calling for a study of the Texas Public Information Act, with an eye toward overhauling a law that was passed in 1973, long before personal computers and the Internet became commonplace in homes and businesses.

"We deal in information ... and the state has that information," Kildow said. "We have to have full access to it, not a redacted copy, not a press release copy, but full access so we can properly represent our clients and see that they get an opportunity for full justice."

Private investigators frequently need information to help clients involved in lawsuits, he said. For example, a person injured in a building collapse might need to know the name of the building inspector. But pending legislation would make it difficult to track down an inspector who left the government payroll.

"If the city won't fully identify that inspector, how would I ever get him before a court of law?" Kildow asked.

At the Freedom of Information Foundation of Texas, an open government and First Amendment advocacy group, Executive Director Keith Elkins said he sees the legislative session as a good news/bad news prospect to this point. The good news, he said, is the Free Flow of Information Act has passed to Gov. Rick Perry for his approval. The law would grant journalists protection from disclosing the identity of confidential sources.

It is intended to guarantee that sources, including government workers who act as whistleblowers, do not have to fear that prosecutors could force reporters to identify them. News organizations and district attorneys, who battled over the issue for years, reached a compromise that prosecutors said would not hurt their ability to gather evidence.

The bad news, Elkins said, "is there seems to be an effort to close off public information that had previously been provided under the Texas Public Information Act," including dates of birth for public employees. Birth dates, he said, are crucial in differentiating among people with similar names. An often-cited example: There are dozens of state employees named Juan Garcia; without their birth dates, how do you tell them apart?

Kildow said the measures as overreaction to identify theft concerns, and said there is a "growing trend" toward reducing open records.

"At every turn, at every legislative session we are seeing more and more bills that are exemptions to open records," he said.

Many of the proposed changes also are a reaction to the new reality of open records. What you used to have to head to a courthouse or state office building to see now can be accessed by computer from home. And the information is available to all, including those who seek it for improper or illegal use.

That new reality has spurred a proposal for a major study of the state of public records in Texas. Elkins said he likes the idea "because the Public Information Act maybe has outgrown itself in some ways because it was set up for paper documents and now we're in the electronic age."

The interim study idea is included in a bill by Sen. Robert Duncan, R-Lubbock. Elkins' group opposes the bill, however, because it also would bar release of birthdates of government workers.

Other public information bills include efforts to restrict access to portions of criminal records, property appraisal records and information about government employees. Bill sponsors say access to some government records can make folks targets for identity theft and other crimes. But lawmakers also acknowledge the popularity of easily accessible public records.

"I know a lot of people enjoy looking these things up," House Ways and Means Chairman Rene Oliveira, D-Brownsville, said at a hearing on a bill allowing Texans to have their names removed from online property appraisal records.

Oliveira said he and others "were surprised many years ago to find out our names and home addresses and our properties are on the Internet for anyone to see."

"There's a balance between protecting people's rights and ensuring transparency and accountability," he said.

A bill by Rep. Yvonne Davis, D-Dallas, concerning online appraisal records offers a look at the competing interests. Davis filed the bill after a constituent's home was broken into by someone the constituent believed got the address from online property appraisal records.

"Not everybody wants all their personal business out there," Davis said.

The Texas Press Association and Texas Daily Newspaper Association, longtime defenders of open records, signed up against the bill at the hearing. Appraisal district officials and the Combined Law Enforcement Associations of Texas signed up to support it.

Davis' bill won committee approval, but only after a significant change resulting from concerns from an industry - real estate - that did not weigh in at the hearing. Under an amendment by Rep. Harvey Hilderbran, R-Kerrville, the bill now would make elected officials the only Texans who could have their names stricken from online property appraisal records.

Hilderbran told colleagues that allowing all Texans to have their names removed would "inconvenience folks in the real estate business" - who use appraisal records to contact property owners -without accomplishing anything "because these addresses are going to be on the Internet somewhere else."

Davis said she now takes a good-enough approach on the amended version of her bill, which is awaiting House floor action.

"Some folks were concerned that it would impact their ability to do their real-estate deals. That's all I can get done," she said of the amended bill.

Why protect elected officials? "I know of instances of people going to officials' houses and knocking on their doors," she said. "And that's a problem."

By Ken Herman (kherman@statesman.com), AMERICAN-STATESMAN STAFF
05/09/2009

Source: http://www.statesman.com/news/content/region/legislature/stories/05/09/0509publicinfo.html

[HOT: After a 2006 Texas Comptroller report recommended abolishing the TRCC and included 4-pages of damning write-in comments from Texas homeowners, the home builders got the Property Code modified to prevent future surveys by blocking access to address information even under an open records request. A Sunset Bill introduced this session similarly blocks records of builder complaints and inspection reports as shown below.]

PROPERTY CODE (Current law from Title 16 TRCC Act)
Sec. 409.002. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION.
(f) Notwithstanding Subsections (d) and (e), the commission may not disclose the address of an individual home registered with the commission:
(1) on the commission's Internet website; or
(2) in connection with an open records request under Chapter 552, Government Code.

SUNSET BILL (CSHB 2295, which extends TRCC for 4 more years)
SECTION 59. Section 428.004, Property Code, is amended by amending Subsections (b) and (c) and adding Subsections (g), (h), and (i) to read as follows:
(g) A final report made available to the public on the commission ’s Internet website may not include the name of the homeowner and must indicate whether the builder offered to make repairs as recommended by the final report or otherwise resolved the dispute with the homeowner.
(h) The commission shall remove a final report, including a request form or other case material relating to the final report, from the commission ’s Internet website if:
(1) the builder has made repairs substantially equivalent to those required by the findings of the final report confirming the defect; and
(2) the commission has confirmed with the homeowner and a third-party inspector who has inspected the repairs that the builder has made those repairs.
(i) A final report removed by the commission under Subsection (h) is not public information subject to disclosure under Chapter 552, Government Code.

 ↑ Back to Top