|
article
feature |
|
Back
|
Print
|
Bookmark |
|
Court rules Kyle didn’t violate Fair Housing
Act |
| |
|
Highlights, [bracketed comments] and related
articles added
The Austin division of the U.S.
District Court for the Western District has ruled that the
city of Kyle did not violate the Fair
Housing Act, nor did it raise building permit fees to
retaliate against the Home Builders Association of Greater
Austin, both allegations from the HBA.
The ruling, handed down on
March 30, ends more than three years of legal battle that began
in November 2005 when the HBA, National Association of Home
Builders and the National Association for the Advancement of
Colored People filed a suit against the city 20 miles south of
Austin. The suit alleged that a revised zoning ordinance
unfairly raised home prices and forced minority buyers out of
the market.
The HBA also took issue when
the city raised its residential building permit fees by more
than 25 percent in anticipation of the lawsuit and its
potential price tag. That move was potentially illegal, HBA
executives said at the time, because Texas law says city fees
should be proportional to the cost of service.
Austin
Business Journal, 04/02/2009 Source:
http://austin.bizjournals.com/austin/stories/2009/03/30/daily44.html
[HOT: We include
this series of
articles to show
a pattern of
volume builders (and
associations
representing
them).]
Pflugerville changes
standards for homes
Builders'
group says codes may be illegal
by Jenny
Robertson (jarobertson@bizjournals.com, 512-494-2523),
Austin Business Journal, 1/13/2006
http://austin.bizjournals.com/austin/stories/2006/01/16/story5.html
Residential building
requirements approved by the City of
Pflugerville have raised the hackles of a local
homebuilders group already engaged in a court fight against
another Central Texas suburb over similar issues.
The Home Builders
Association of Greater Austin says the design
standards might price minorities out of Pflugerville's housing
market, which could violate the federal
Fair Housing Act. In a lawsuit filed against the City of
Kyle in November, the association cited the same
concerns.
Specifically,
the group protests rules that would
require front-yard sprinklers and a 100-square-foot,
covered back patio on new homes in Pflugerville.
The association also criticizes new landscaping and
architectural standards.
"Should the city be in the
business of mandating ... covered patios?" asks Harry
Savio, executive vice president of the association. "What
does that have to do with the health, safety and welfare of a
community?"
Savio says an estimate by one
of the association's members suggested the requirements
could add $21,000 to the price of
a house. If that increase disproportionately affects minority
homebuyers, it could violate federal laws that prohibit
discrimination in housing-related transactions, Savio
says.
[HOT: $21,000? That obsurd is at
least 3 times too high. Maybe the builders are just upset
that these are two options they can't charge high-margin
fees for.]
Pflugerville Mayor Cat Callen
says the codes were drafted by a committee comprising
representatives of homebuilders, neighborhoods, the City
Council, and the Planning and Zoning Commission. The council
gave initial approval to the codes at its Jan. 10
meeting.
Callen says the rules do not
violate fair housing because they don't mandate minimum housing
sizes or costs. Plus, she says, they provide more housing
flexibility.
"We were actually trying to
make it easier for homebuilders to come to Pflugerville and
offer more diversity," Callen says.
Although the Home Builders
Association hasn't threatened to file suit against
Pflugerville, the group is in a legal joust with the City of
Kyle. The National Association of Home Builders and the
National Association for the Advancement of Colored People
joined the local association in the Kyle suit.
The suit centers on Kyle zoning
ordinances passed about two years ago, including increased
minimum lot sizes, masonry requirements and landscaping rules.
The plaintiffs want the U.S. District Court in Austin to
invalidate the zoning ordinances and to prohibit Kyle from
enforcing similar laws.
Home
Builders file suit against City of Kyle
Austin Business
Journal, 11/29/2005
http://austin.bizjournals.com/austin/stories/2005/11/28/daily8.html
The Home Builders
Association of Greater Austin has filed suit against
the City of Kyle alleging that the city's zoning ordinances
unfairly raise home prices and force minority buyers out of the
market.
The suit was filed Nov. 22 in the Austin division of U.S.
District Court. The National Association for the
Advancement of Colored People and the National
Association of Home Builders joined the local
association in its complaint.
Harry Savio, executive vice president of the
local home builders association, referred comment to attorneys
representing the group and the NAACP. Those attorneys could not
immediately be reached.
The complaint asks the court to declare the zoning ordinances
invalid and to enter a permanent injunction against Kyle from
enforcing similar laws.
The disagreement stems from zoning ordinances passed by Kyle
about two years ago. Specifically, the association cites the
city's increased minimum lot size, masonry requirements and
landscaping stipulations as measures that increase housing
prices.
The group says the higher costs violate the Fair Housing Act,
which prohibits discrimination in housing-related
transactions.
Michael Klein, an Austin-based lawyer
representing the National Association of Home Builders, says he
expects the city to file a response in about 20 days.
Klein says his clients have not alleged that the city
intentionally discriminated against minorities. But he adds
that, under the Fair Housing Act, even unintentional
discrimination is unlawful.
"Even if a city says they want [zoning laws] for
aesthetic purposes -- we want a nicer, cleaner, better-looking
city -- you need to thinkg about what they're really
saying," Klein says. "What they're really saying is
they want to keep out lower income residences.
"It's a fine line between whether it's intentional or
not."
Tom Mattis, Kyle's city manager, says he can't comment on
specifics of the suit, but calls the claims "completely
unfounded and borderline frivolous."
"If their claims were valid, I think it would bring into
question some of the most basic enforcement of zoning
laws," Mattis says.
In October, Kyle raised its residential building permit fees by
more than 25 percent, a move the city says will help fill its
coffers in anticipation of what it expects to be a pricey
lawsuit. City officials estimated at the time that the suit
could cost $250,000 to defend.
When the zoning requirements
were passed, the city grandfathered about 10,000 homes under
the old zoning regulations, Mattis says. No new homes have yet
to be built under the new guidelines in Kyle, he
adds.
Homebuilders decry
Kyle's permit fee hike
City says possible lawsuit
creates need
by Jenny
Robertson Austin Business Journal, 11/04/2005
http://austin.bizjournals.com/austin/stories/2005/11/07/story5.html
An ongoing disagreement between the City of Kyle and a group
representing local homebuilders has taken a somewhat ironic
twist.
Last month, Kyle raised its residential
building permit fees by more than 25 percent, a move the
city says will help fill its coffers in anticipation of what
could be a pricey lawsuit threatened by the Home Builders
Association of Greater Austin.
For its part, the association has considered suing Kyle over
the city's zoning laws, which the group says drive up home
costs and push low-income buyers -- particularly minorities --
out of the market.
The average building permit for a single-family home cost about
$713 last year, says Tom Mattis, Kyle's city
manager. Under the new fee structure, the average permit will
cost about $900.
Mattis says the city made a commitment to its residents several
years ago to ensure they wouldn't bear the costs for future
development. Fees were set to cover services necessary for
housing, such as building inspections.
When examining costs for next year, the city included the
potential price of legal defense against the association's
lawsuit, he says.
"It's very expensive litigation," Mattis says. "We
expect the cost to be in the neighborhood of $250,000 to defend
ourselves, which we fully intend to do."
But Harry Savio, executive vice president of
the Home Builders Association, says the fee increase itself
might be illegal because it will go toward litigation and not
toward building inspections. Case law in Texas has established
that city fees should be roughly proportional to the cost of
service, he says, to prevent municipalities from profiting from
fees.
In a September letter to city officials, Savio said the
increased fees will serve as a barrier to affordable
housing.
"The big losers will be the people you need to run your
city, like teachers, firemen, police officers and so on,"
he wrote.
The city and the association have sparred over zoning
ordinances passed about two years ago. Specifically, the
association cites the city's increased minimum lot size,
masonry requirements and landscaping stipulations as measures
that increase housing prices.
Savio says the higher costs violate the Fair Housing Act, which
prohibits discrimination in housing-related transactions. But
Mattis called that "a ridiculous claim."
"It goes right to the heart of every city's ability to
regulate any kind of development," he says.
From January 2002 through the end of 2005, Kyle will have
issued more than 4,000 single family residence permits, Mattis
says. Peter French, president of the Kyle
Chamber of Commerce & Visitors Bureau and a developer in
the Plum Creek subdivision, says the rise in permit fees won't
affect those numbers.
"I don't really see any serious negative consequence of
bumping this fee," French says. "It's a pretty
insignificant amount of money compared to the purchase price of
the home or the lot."
Mattis says the city's homebuilders never raised complaints
over the zoning changes.
"We invited them to the table, and many came and gave their
input," he says.
But Savio says developers might feel pressured to keep
quiet.
"It's hard to be in a regulatory environment -- where
people have significant control over your ability to do
business -- and be extremely critical," he
says.
↑
Back to Top
|